Zobrazit minimální záznam



dc.contributor.authorJáchymová B.
dc.contributor.authorKrása J.
dc.contributor.authorDostál T.
dc.contributor.authorBauer M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-29T22:48:27Z
dc.date.available2022-08-29T22:48:27Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifierV3S-345264
dc.identifier.citationJÁCHYMOVÁ, B., et al. Can Lumped Characteristics of a Contributing Area Provide Risk Definition of Sediment Flux?. Water. 2020, 12(6), ISSN 2073-4441. DOI 10.3390/w12061787. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/6/1787/htm
dc.identifier.issn2073-4441 (online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10467/103650
dc.description.abstractAccelerated soil erosion by water has many offsite impacts on the municipal infrastructure. This paper discusses how to easily detect potential risk points around municipalities by simple spatial analysis using GIS. In the Czech Republic, the WaTEM/SEDEM model is verified and used in large scale studies to assess sediment transports. Instead of computing actual sediment transports in river systems, WaTEM/SEDEM has been innovatively used in high spatial detail to define indices of sediment flux from small contributing areas. Such an approach has allowed for the modeling of sediment fluxes in contributing areas with above 127,484 risk points, covering the entire Czech Republic territory. Risk points are defined as outlets of contributing areas larger than 1 ha, wherein the surface runoff goes into residential areas or vulnerable bodies of water. Sediment flux indices were calibrated by conducting terrain surveys in 4 large watersheds and splitting the risk points into 5 groups defined by the intensity of sediment transport threat. The best sediment flux index resulted from the correlation between the modeled total sediment input in a 100 m buffer zone of the risk point and the field survey data (R2 from 0.57 to 0.91 for the calibration watersheds). Correlation analysis and principal component analysis (PCA) of the modeled indices and their relation to 11 lumped characteristics of the contributing areas were computed (average K-factor; average R-factor; average slope; area of arable land; area of forest; area of grassland; total watershed area; average planar curvature; average profile curvature; specific width; stream power index). The comparison showed that for risk definition the most important is a combination of morphometric characteristics (specific width and stream power index), followed by watershed area, proportion of grassland, soil erodibility, and rain erosivity (described by PC2).eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.ispartofWater
dc.subjectsoil erosioneng
dc.subjectsediment fluxeng
dc.subjecttotal soil losseng
dc.subjectwatershed characteristicseng
dc.subjectPCA analysiseng
dc.subjectRUSLEeng
dc.titleCan Lumped Characteristics of a Contributing Area Provide Risk Definition of Sediment Flux?eng
dc.typečlánek v časopisecze
dc.typejournal articleeng
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/w12061787
dc.relation.projectidinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Ministry of Interior/VG/VG20122015092/CZ/Erosion runoff - increased risk of the residents and the water quality exposure in the context of the expected climate change/
dc.relation.projectidinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports/LT/LTC18030/CZ/The effects of land use changes on soil erosion, sediment transport, water quality and runoff conditions/
dc.relation.projectidinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Ministry of Agriculture/QK/QK1920224/CZ/Ways of soil erosion protection on the farm level after glyphosate ban/
dc.rights.accessopenAccess
dc.identifier.wos000549451100001
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewed
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85087543038


Soubory tohoto záznamu


Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích

Zobrazit minimální záznam