Comparison between the Wilhelmy surface tension measurement method and the pendant drop shape analysis method
Typ dokumentu
articlePeer-reviewed
publishedVersion
Autor
Cavalcante de Farias, Estela Cristina
Kropf Santos Fermam, Ricardo
de Mendonça, Amsterdam de J. Souza Marques
Práva
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
openAccess
Metadata
Zobrazit celý záznamAbstrakt
Surface tension plays an essential role in various laboratory and industrial processes. The Fluid Metrology Laboratory (Laflu) of the National Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology (Inmetro) uses the Wilhelmy and DuNoüy methods and has a tensiometer for determining surface tension by the drop shape analysis method in use. One way to ensure the reliability of surface tension measurement results is to compare the methods used. A comparison was made between the Wilhelmy method and the drop shape analysis method. The comparison involved measurements of the surface tension of these liquids: bidistilled water, n-dodecane, and Perfluorocarbon (FC-40), and used the calculation of the Normalized Error (EN), presenting results according to acompatible criterion. Analysing the uncertainties involved, the contribution of the uncertainty of the regression used in the correction of the tensiometer indication was the most relevant.
Kolekce
K tomuto záznamu jsou přiřazeny následující licenční soubory:
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License