Zobrazit minimální záznam



dc.contributor.authorHabart D.
dc.contributor.authorŠvihlík J.
dc.contributor.authorSchier J.
dc.contributor.authorCahová M.
dc.contributor.authorGirman P.
dc.contributor.authorZacharovová K.
dc.contributor.authorBerková Z.
dc.contributor.authorKříž J.
dc.contributor.authorFabryová E.
dc.contributor.authorKosinová L.
dc.contributor.authorPapáčková Z.
dc.contributor.authorKybic J.
dc.contributor.authorSaudek F.
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-15T15:21:56Z
dc.date.available2020-01-15T15:21:56Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifierV3S-304584
dc.identifier.citationHABART, D., et al. Automated Analysis of Microscopic Images of Isolated Pancreatic Islets. Cell Transplantation. 2016, 25(12), 2145-2156. ISSN 0963-6897. DOI 10.3727/096368916X692005.
dc.identifier.issn0963-6897 (print)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10467/85967
dc.description.abstractClinical islet transplantation programs rely on the capacities of individual centers to quantify isolated islets. Current computer-assisted methods require input from human operators. Here we describe two machine learning algorithms for islet quantification: the trainable islet algorithm (TIA) and the nontrainable purity algorithm (NPA). These algorithms automatically segment pancreatic islets and exocrine tissue on microscopic images in order to count individual islets and calculate islet volume and purity. References for islet counts and volumes were generated by the fully manual segmentation (FMS) method, which was validated against the internal DNA standard. References for islet purity were generated via the expert visual assessment (EVA) method, which was validated against the FMS method. The TIA is intended to automatically evaluate micrographs of isolated islets from future donors after being trained on micrographs from a limited number of past donors. Its training ability was first evaluated on 46 images from four donors. The pixel-to-pixel comparison, binary statistics, and islet DNA concentration indicated that the TIA was successfully trained, regardless of the color differences of the original images. Next, the TIA trained on the four donors was validated on an additional 36 images from nine independent donors. The TIA was fast (67 s/image), correlated very well with the FMS method (R 2 = 1.00 and 0.92 for islet volume and islet count, respectively), and had small REs (0.06 and 0.07 for islet volume and islet count, respectively). Validation of the NPA against the EVA method using 70 images from 12 donors revealed that the NPA had a reasonable speed (69 s/image), had an acceptable RE (0.14), and correlated well with the EVA method (R 2 = 0.88). Our results demonstrate that a fully automated analysis of clinical-grade micrographs of isolated pancreatic islets is feasible. The algorithms described herein will be freely available as a Fiji platform plugin.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherCognizant Communication Corporation
dc.relation.ispartofCell Transplantation
dc.subjectEnumeration of isletseng
dc.subjectImage processingeng
dc.subjectImage segmentationeng
dc.subjectIslet transplantationeng
dc.subjectMachine learningeng
dc.subjectQuality controleng
dc.titleAutomated Analysis of Microscopic Images of Isolated Pancreatic Isletseng
dc.typečlánek v časopisecze
dc.typejournal articleeng
dc.identifier.doi10.3727/096368916X692005
dc.relation.projectidinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Czech Science Foundation/GA/GA14-10440S/CZ/Automatic analysis of microscopy images of Langerhans islets/GAČR Švihlík
dc.rights.accessrestrictedAccess
dc.identifier.wos000390183200005
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewed
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85007086435


Soubory tohoto záznamu


Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích

Zobrazit minimální záznam